Advertisement
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.
Advertisement
No AccessJournal of UrologyInvestigative Urology1 Jul 2011

Optimal Freeze Cycle Length for Renal Cryotherapy

    View All Author Information

    Purpose:

    To our knowledge the optimal freeze cycle length in renal cryotherapy is unknown. Ten-minute time based freeze cycles were compared to temperature based freeze cycles to −20C.

    Materials and Methods:

    Laparoscopic renal cryotherapy was performed on 16 swine. Time based trials consisted of a double 10-minute freeze separated by a 5-minute thaw. Temperature based trials were double cycles of 1, 5 or 10-minute freeze initiated after 1 of 4 sensors indicated −20C. A 5-minute active thaw was used between freeze cycles. Control trials consisted of cryoneedle placement for 25 minutes without freeze or thaw. Viability staining and histological analysis were done.

    Results:

    There was no difference in cellular necrosis between any of the temperature based freeze cycles (p = 0.1). Time based freeze cycles showed more nuclear pyknosis, indicative of necrosis, than the 3 experimental freeze cycles for the renal cortex (p = 0.05) but not for the renal medulla (p = 0.61). Mean time to −20C for freeze cycle 1 was 19 minutes 10 seconds (range 9 to 46 minutes). In 4 of 21 trials (19%) −20C was never attained despite freezing for 25 to 63 minutes.

    Conclusions:

    There was no difference in immediate cellular necrosis among double 1, 5 or 10-minute freeze cycles. Cellular necrosis was evident on histological analysis for trials in which −20C was attained and in freeze cycles based on time alone. With a standard 10-minute cryoablation period most treated parenchyma 1 cm from the probe never attained −20C. Cell death appeared to occur at temperatures warmer than −20C during renal cryotherapy.

    References

    • 1 : Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology1998; 51: 203. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 : The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer2004; 100: 738. Google Scholar
    • 3 : Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as a safe alternative to invasive therapy. Urology2004; 64: 49. Google Scholar
    • 4 : Natural history of small renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of growth rate, histological grade, cell proliferation and apoptosis. J Urol2004; 172: 863. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 5 : Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. BJU Int2008; 68: 737. Google Scholar
    • 6 : Incidence of benign lesions for clinically localized renal masses smaller than 7 cm in radiological diameter: influence of sex. J Urol2006; 176: 2391. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 7 : Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort. J Urol2005; 173: 1889. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 8 : Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol1999; 162: 1930. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 9 : Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology2002; 59: 816. Google Scholar
    • 10 : Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared to partial nephrectomy. J Urol2008; 179: 468. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al: Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182: 1271. Google Scholar
    • 12 : Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma—a meta-analysis and review. J Urol2008; 179: 1227. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 13 : Renal cryoablation: outcome at 3 years. J Urol2005; 173: 1903. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 14 : Growth rates of primary and metastatic lesions of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol2001; 8: 473. Google Scholar
    • 15 : The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world. J Urol2006; 175: 425. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 16 : Early phase acute myocardial infarct size quantification: validation of the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride tissue enzyme staining technique. Am Heart J1981; 101: 593. Google Scholar
    • 17 : Measurement and prediction of thermal behavior and acute assessment of injury in a pig model of renal cryosurgery. J Endourol2001; 15: 193. Google Scholar
    • 18 : Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. Cryobiology1998; 37: 171. Google Scholar
    • 19 : Percutaneous cryosurgery for renal tumours. Br J Urol1995; 75: 132. Google Scholar
    • 20 : Monitoring renal cryosurgery: predictors of tissue necrosis in swine. J Urol1998; 159: 1370. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 21 : Renal cryoablation in a canine model. Urology1996; 47: 772. Google Scholar
    • 22 : Percutaneous cryoablation of the kidney in a porcine model. Cryobiology1999; 38: 89. Google Scholar
    • 23 : Effect of freeze time during renal cryoablation: a swine model. J Endourol2006; 20: 1101. Google Scholar
    • 24 : Effect of freezing parameters (freeze cycle and thaw process) on tissue destruction following renal cryoablation. J Endourol2002; 16: 519. Google Scholar
    • 25 : Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: acute and long-term clinical, radiographic, and pathologic effects in an animal model and application in a clinical trial. J Endourol1999; 13: 233. Google Scholar
    • 26 : Precise characterization of renal parenchymal response to single and multiple cryoablation probes. J Urol2006; 176: 784. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 27 : Acute histologic changes in human renal tumors after cryoablation. J Endourol2000; 14: 139. Google Scholar
    • 28 : Survival in hostile environments: strategies of renal medullary cells. Physiology2006; 21: 171. Google Scholar