Advertisement
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.
Advertisement

Purpose:

The treatment of small renal tumors continues to evolve in parallel with advances in ablative technology. We compared the lesion geometry of 3, 17 gauge cryoneedles to determine the most effective distance and configuration of the cryoneedles in an in vivo porcine kidney model.

Materials and Methods:

Argon gas based renal cryoablation was performed in 6 pigs using a laparoscopically assisted percutaneous approach. Cryoablation using a single cryoneedle and a template of 3 cryoneedles with various ice ball shapes, including elliptical, bulb-shaped and standard 17 gauge cryoneedles (Galil Medical, Plymouth Meadow, Pennsylvania) was performed in 3 pigs. Three additional pigs underwent renal cryoablation using elliptical cryoneedles in 3 triangular template configurations with the cryoneedles spaced 1, 1.5 and 2 cm apart, respectively. The animals were sacrificed a minimum of 2 weeks following treatment.

Results:

Elliptical cryoneedles achieved the largest area of necrosis when used in single and template configurations. When used in a template configuration of 3 needles 1, 1.5 and 2 cm apart from each other the calculated volume of necrosis was 4.3 × 4.5 × 2.5, 4.9 × 4.1 × 2.5 and 4.0 × 4.5 × 2.5 cm, respectively.

Conclusions:

Using a single 17 gauge cryoneedle is inadequate for treating most small renal tumors. Cryoneedles with an elliptical ice ball are most effective for achieving consistent and reliable tissue destruction. The 1.5 cm template configuration generated the largest area of necrosis. Our data suggest that with the current technology renal cryoablation should be limited to lesions not greater than 4 cm.

References

  • 1 : Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system. J Clin Oncol1999; 17: 2868. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 : Open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Curr Urol Rep2006; 7: 31. Google Scholar
  • 3 : Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes. Eur Urol2006; 49: 660. Google Scholar
  • 4 : Comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryoablation for renal hilar tumors. Urology2006; 67: 50. Google Scholar
  • 5 : Cryotherapy: clinical end points and their experimental foundations. Urology2006; 68: 38. Google Scholar
  • 6 : Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology2006; 68: 7. Google Scholar
  • 7 : Comparison of cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound for treating small renal tumours. BJU Int2005; 96: 1224. Google Scholar
  • 8 : Energy ablative techniques for treatment of small renal tumors. Curr Opin Urol2006; 16: 321. Google Scholar
  • 9 : Focal tumor ablation: a new era in cancer therapy. Ultrasound Q2006; 22: 195. Google Scholar
  • 10 : Renal cryoablation: still experimental?. Int J Urol2006; 13: 885. Google Scholar
  • 11 : Initial experience with laparoscopically assisted percutaneous cryotherapy of renal tumors. J Endourol2005; 19: 480. Google Scholar
  • 12 : Renal cryosurgery: experimental evaluation of treatment parameters. Urology1998; 52: 29. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 : Renal cryoablation: outcome at 3 years. J Urol2005; 173: 1903. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 : Percutaneous renal tumor cryoablation with magnetic resonance imaging guidance. J Urol2001; 165: 773. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15 : The effects of intentional cryoablation and radio frequency ablation of renal tissue involving the collecting system in a porcine model. J Urol2005; 173: 1368. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16 : Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. Cryobiology1998; 37: 171. Google Scholar
  • 17 : Percutaneous cryosurgery for renal tumours. Br J Urol1995; 75: 132. Google Scholar
  • 18 : Minimally invasive cryosurgery–technological advances. Cryobiology1997; 34: 373. Google Scholar
  • 19 : Enhanced renal cryoablation with hilar clamping and intrarenal cooling in a porcine model. Urology2004; 63: 1209. Google Scholar
  • 20 : Enhanced renal parenchymal cryoablation with novel 17-gauge cryoprobes. Urology2004; 64: 173. Google Scholar

Departments of Urology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (DG, JWS), David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California