Initial Experience With Inpatient Hospital Care at Home for Urologic Disease
This article is commented on by the following:
Abstract
Introduction:
In 2020, Mayo Clinic launched Advanced Care at Home (ACH), a hospital-at-home program that cares for high-acuity inpatients via remote monitoring and in-person care. Herein, we describe our initial experience utilizing ACH for patients with urologic problems.
Methods:
We identified ACH patients treated at Mayo Clinic Florida from July 2020 to August 2022. Records were reviewed to identify those with urologic problems, defined as genitourinary infections, urinary tract obstruction, bleeding, or complications following urologic surgery within 90 days of admission. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ACH interventions, length of stay, and hospital readmission were assessed.
Results:
We identified 563 ACH admissions involving 537 patients, of whom 51 (9%) had illnesses with urologic etiology and 3 (0.6%) were admitted for nonurologic postoperative complications following urologic surgery. Admitting diagnoses included pyelonephritis (n = 51, 91%) and epididymoorchitis (n = 2, 4%). Postoperative diagnoses included cellulitis (n = 1, 2%), congestive heart failure (n = 1, 2%), and diverticulitis (n = 1, 2%). Median Charlson Comorbidity Index of admitted patients was 4 (interquartile range: 3-6.8). Twenty-five patients (46%) underwent 38 urologic procedures within 90 days of admission. Interventions included IV antibiotics (n = 51, 91%), IV fluids (n = 12, 21%), IV antifungals (n = 2, 4%), and oral diuretic therapy (n = 1, 2%). Median length of stay was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-4), and 9 patients (16%) were readmitted within 30 days. A total of 216 inpatient hospital days were saved by utilizing ACH.
Conclusions:
ACH appeared to be a feasible alternative to brick-and-mortar inpatient care for patients with genitourinary infections requiring IV antimicrobials.
References
- 1. . Days spent at home—a patient-centered goal and outcome. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(17):1610-1612. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607206 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2. . Overall patient experience with a virtual hybrid hospital at home program. SAGE Open Med. 2022; 10:20503121221092589. doi: 10.1177/20503121221092589 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 3. . Implementation of a virtual and in-person hybrid hospital-at-home model in two geographically separate regions utilizing a single command center: a descriptive cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09144-w Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 4. . Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(3):CD000356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000356.pub2 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 5. . Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. CMAJ. 2009; 180(2):175-182. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081491 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 6. . Efficacy of hospital at home in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0129282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129282 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 7. . Hospital-level care at home for acutely ill adults: a qualitative evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36(7):1965-1973. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06416-7 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 8. . Comparison of hospital-at-home models: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(1):e043285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043285 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 9. . Effect of hospital-at-home vs. traditional brick-and-mortar hospital care in acutely ill adults: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022; 23(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06430-6 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 10. . Diagnosis related groups of patients admitted from an urban academic medical center to a virtual hybrid hospital-at-home program. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023; 16:759-768. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S402355 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 11. . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12. QualityNet. Acute Hospital Care at Home Resources. 2023. Accessed December 14, 2023. https://qualitynet.cms.gov/acute-hospital-care-at-home/resources Google Scholar
- 13. . The role of digital technology in surgical home hospital programs. NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00750-w Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14. . A comprehensive framework for hospital@home care models. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024; 314:27-31. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240051 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 15. . Hospital at home: emergence of a high-value model of care delivery. Egypt J Intern Med. 2023; 35(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s43162-023-00206-3 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 16. . Costs for “hospital at home” patients were 19 percent lower, with equal or better outcomes compared to similar inpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31(6):1237-1243. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1132 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 17. . Hospital-level care at home for acutely ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172(2):77-85. doi: 10.7326/M19-0600 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 18. . Association of a bundled hospital-at-home and 30-day postacute transitional care program with clinical outcomes and patient experiences. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(8):1033-1040. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2562 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 19. . Potential impact of hospital at home on postoperative readmissions. Am J Manag Care. 2021; 27(12):e420-e425. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88797 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 20. . Severity of illness and risk of mortality in Mayo Clinic's virtual hybrid advanced care at home program: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09333-7 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 21. . Provider evaluation of a novel virtual hybrid hospital at home model. Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15:1909-1918. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S354101 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
Funding/Support: None.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lyon reports being a consultant/advisor for Bristol Myers Squibb, ImmunityBio, Urogen Pharma and a scientific study/trial investigator for Protara Therapeutics, Merck, Janssen, CG Oncology. Dr Thiel reports being an investigator for Grail, Inc. No other disclosures were reported.
Ethics Statement: This study was considered exempt by our Institutional Review Board (No. 23-003202).
Author Contributions:
Conception and design: Maniaci, Pathak, Hanchate, Pak, Lyon.
Critical revision of the manuscript for scientific and factual content: Thiel, Hanchate, Maniaci, Pathak, Pak, Lyon.
Drafting the manuscript: Hanchate, Pathak, Lyon.
Data analysis and interpretation: Thiel, Hanchate, Pak, Lyon.
Statistical analysis: Hanchate, Lyon.
Supervision: Thiel, Maniaci, Pathak, Pak, Lyon.
Data Availability: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.