Lymph Node Mapping in Patients with Penile Cancer Undergoing Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
Abstract
Purpose:
A map of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer helps to clarify the pattern of pelvic spread and define the reasonable limits of dissection, and it has not been established. We aim to provide an accurate map of lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer and determine the reasonable extent of pelvic lymph node dissection.
Materials and Methods:
We enrolled patients with penile cancer undergoing pelvic lymph node dissection (128) at our institution from 1999 to 2018. The numbers of removed lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes at 10 distinct regions were recorded. The chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used.
Results:
The median number of pelvic lymph nodes retrieved was 18 (IQR 10–30), with the majority being from the external iliac package (43.0%) and obturator package (31.9%). Pelvic lymph node metastasis was present in 57/128 (44.5%) patients. The median number of positive pelvic lymph nodes removed was 2 (IQR 1–4), with the majority being from the external iliac package (50.0%) and obturator package (36.6%). Advanced T-stage was related to higher risk of pelvic lymph node metastasis, which was present in 30.3%, 44.2%, 59.0% and 58.3% of patients with pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4, respectively. Notably, 2 patients had crossover metastasis from 1 inguinal region to the contralateral pelvic region.
Conclusions:
We present a detailed map of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with penile carcinoma. The external iliac and obturator packages appear to be most commonly involved. Optimal pelvic lymph node dissection may extend to the common iliac artery, including common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes. Extranodal extension in inguinal nodes may not be as important as previously thought.
References
- 1. : EAU guidelines on penile cancer. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 1. Google Scholar
- 2. : Tumors of the penis. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology, 10th ed. Edited by . Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier2012. Google Scholar
- 3. : Anatomical mapping of lymphatic drainage in penile carcinoma with SPECT-CT: implications for the extent of inguinal lymph node dissection. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 885. Google Scholar
- 4. : Prospectively packaged ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the disseminative pattern of lymph node metastasis. J Urol 2009; 181: 2103. Link, Google Scholar
- 5. : Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 1075. Google Scholar
- 6. : NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology–Penile Cancer. Version 2. Washington, D.C.: National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2018. Google Scholar
- 7. : EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 142. Google Scholar
- 8. : The relationship between characteristics of inguinal lymph nodes and pelvic lymph node involvement in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a single institution experience. J Urol 2014; 191: 977. Link, Google Scholar
- 9. : Does extended lymphadenectomy increase the morbidity of radical cystectomy?BJU Int 2004; 93: 64. Google Scholar
- 10. : Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Urol 2002; 167: 1638. Link, Google Scholar
- 11. : Extended vs non-extended pelvic lymph node dissection and their influence on recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int 2014; 113: 39. Google Scholar
- 12. : Establishing criteria for bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer: lessons learned from an international multicenter collaboration. J Urol 2015; 194: 696. Link, Google Scholar
- 13. : Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in penile cancer may impact survival. World J Urol 2016; 34: 353. Google Scholar
- 14. : Extensive inguinal lymphadenectomy improves overall 5-year survival in penile cancer patients: results from the surveillance, eepidemiology, and end results program. Cancer 2010; 116: 2960. Google Scholar
- 15. : Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome. J Urol 2010; 184: 546. Link, Google Scholar
- 16. : Fascia lata preservation during inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: rationale and outcome. Urology 2013; 82: 642. Google Scholar
- 17. : Super extended versus extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparative study. J Urol 2011; 186: 1261. Link, Google Scholar
- 18. : Lymph node dissection technique is more important than lymph node count in identifying nodal metastases in radical cystectomy patients: a comparative mapping study. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 946. Google Scholar
- 19. : Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 161. Google Scholar
- 20. : Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping. J Urol 2004; 172: 1286. Link, Google Scholar
- 21. : Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in cystectomy specimens. J Urol 2001; 166: 2295. Link, Google Scholar
- 22. : Adjuvant pelvic radiation is associated with improved survival and decreased disease recurrence in pelvic node-positive penile cancer after lymph node dissection: a multi-institutional study. Urol Oncol 2017; 35: 17. Google Scholar
- 23. : Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1996; 156: 1637. Link, Google Scholar
Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 19ykpy178), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2019A1515010197) and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Medical scientist training program (No. 14zxqk08).
No direct or indirect commercial, personal, academic, political, religious or ethical incentive is associated with publishing this article.
