VARIATIONS AMONG HIGH VOLUME SURGEONS IN THE RATE OF COMPLICATIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT TECHNIQUE MATTERS
Abstract
Purpose:
A strong association between surgeon, hospital volume and postoperative morbidity of radical prostatectomy has been demonstrated. While better outcomes are associated with high volume surgeons, the degree of variation in outcomes among surgeons has not been fully examined.
Materials and Methods:
Using a linked database from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries and federal Medicare claims data, we analyzed outcomes of consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 1996. We focused on variations in several measures of morbidity (perioperative complications, late urinary complications and long-term incontinence) among patients of high volume surgeons, defined as those with 20 or more patients in the study period. After adjusting for hospital, surgeon volume and case mix, we examined the extent to which variations in the rates of adverse outcomes differed among surgeons for all 3 end points.
Results:
Of the 999 surgeons 16% (159) performed 48.7% (5,238) of the 10,737 radical prostatectomies during the study. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.5%, the major postoperative complication rate was 28.6%, late urinary complications 25.2% (major events 16%) and long-term incontinence 6.7%. For all 3 morbidity outcomes the variation among surgeons in the rate of complications was significantly greater than that expected by chance (p =0.001 for each) after adjustment of covariates. Furthermore, surgeons with better (or worse) than average results with regard to 1 outcome were likely to have better (or worse, respectively) results with regard to the other 2 outcome measures.
Conclusions:
Morbidity end points that directly affect quality of life showed significant variability among high volume providers. Surgeons who performed well in 1 area (eg postoperative complications) performed well in others. These results further suggest that variations in surgical technique and postoperative care lead to variations in outcomes after radical prostatectomy, indicating that outcomes of this operation are sensitive to small differences in performance.
References
- 1 : Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med2002; 137: 511. Google Scholar
- 2 : Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med2002; 346: 1128. Google Scholar
- 3 : Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg1997; 84: 657. Google Scholar
- 4 : Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med2003; 349: 2117. Google Scholar
- 5 : Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin2003; 53: 5. Google Scholar
- 6 : A nationwide charge comparison of the principal treatments for early stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer2000; 89: 1792. Google Scholar
- 7 : Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med2002; 346: 1138. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 8 : Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol1993; 46: 1075. Google Scholar
- 9 : The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes. Ann Intern Med2003; 139: 658. Google Scholar
- 10 : The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med2001; 345: 181. Google Scholar
- 11 : Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland. Ann Thorac Surg2001; 72: 334. Google Scholar
- 12 : Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA1997; 277: 892. Google Scholar
- 13 : The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. J Urol2000; 163: 867. Link, Google Scholar
- 14 : Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. Ann Intern Med2003; 139: 649. Google Scholar
- 15 : The challenge of benchmarking: surgical volume and operative mortality in Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc1996; 1: 34. Google Scholar
- 16 : Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol2003; 21: 401. Google Scholar
- 17 : Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol2003; 170: 2292. Link, Google Scholar
- 18 : Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon’s training, certification, and experience. Surgery2002; 132: 663. Google Scholar
- 19 : Taking stock of volume-outcome studies. J Clin Oncol2003; 21: 393. Google Scholar
- 20 : Impact of a clinical pathway for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology1998; 52: 94. Google Scholar
Departments of Urology (FJB, MWK, PTS), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (ERR, CBB, MWK), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
