REPEAT URETHROTOMY AND DILATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF URETHRAL STRICTURE ARE NEITHER CLINICALLY EFFECTIVE NOR COST-EFFECTIVE
Abstract
Purpose:
We developed an algorithm for the management of urethral stricture based on cost-effectiveness.
Materials and Methods:
United Kingdom medical and hospital costs associated with the current management of urethral stricture were calculated using private medical insurance schedules of reimbursement and clean intermittent self-catheterization supply costs. These costs were applied to 126 new patients treated endoscopically for urethral stricture in a general urological setting between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1999. Treatment failure was defined as recurrent symptomatic stricture requiring further operative intervention following initial intervention. Mean followup available was 25 months (range 1 to 132).
Results:
The costs were urethrotomy/urethral dilation £2,250.00 ($3,375.00, ratio 1.00), simple 1-stage urethroplasty £5,015.00 ($7,522.50, ratio 2.23), complex 1-stage urethroplasty £5,335.00 ($8,002.50, ratio 2.37) and 2-stage urethroplasty £10,370 ($15,555.00, ratio 4.61). Of the 126 patients assessed 60 (47.6%) required more than 1 endoscopic retreatments (mean 3.13 each), 50 performed biweekly clean intermittent self-catheterization and 7 underwent urethroplasty during followup. The total cost per patient for all 126 patients for stricture treatment during followup was £6,113 ($9,170). This cost was calculated by multiplying procedure cost by the number of procedures performed. A strategy of urethrotomy or urethral dilation as first line treatment, followed by urethroplasty for recurrence yielded a total cost per patient of £5,866 ($8,799).
Conclusions:
A strategy of initial urethrotomy or urethral dilation followed by urethroplasty in patients with recurrent stricture proves to be the most cost-effective strategy. This financially based strategy concurs with evidence based best practice for urethral stricture management.
References
- 1 : Urethral strictures and their surgical treatment. BJU Int2000; 86: 571. Google Scholar
- 2 : Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol1997; 157: 98. Link, Google Scholar
- 3 : Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey. J Urol2001; 165: 13. abstract 53. Google Scholar
- 4 Andrich D.E., MacDonald J., Greenwell T.J., Mundy A.R.: Treatment of pelvic fracture related urethral trauma: a survey of current practice in the UK. Unpublished data Google Scholar
- 5 : Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful?. J Urol1998; 160: 356. Link, Google Scholar
- 6 : Direct vision internal urethrotomy. A critical review of 365 operations. Br J Urol1984; 56: 308. Google Scholar
- 7 : Urethroplasty for posterior urethral strictures. Br J Urol1996; 78: 243. Google Scholar
- 8 : Repair of pelvic fracture posterior urethral defects using an elaborated perineal approach: experience with 74 cases. J Urol1991; 145: 744. Link, Google Scholar
- 9 : Excision and anastomotic repair for urethral stricture disease: experience with 150 cases. Eur Urol1997; 32: 433. Google Scholar
- 10 : Analysis of factors contributing to success or failure of 1-stage urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease. J Urol1994; 151: 869. Link, Google Scholar
- 11 : Long-term results of intermittent low-friction self-catheterization in patients with recurrent urethral strictures. Br J Urol1994; 74: 790. Google Scholar
- 12 : A prospective randomized study of self-dilatation in the management of urethral strictures. J R Coll Surg Edinb1995; 40: 295. Google Scholar
- 13 : The use of self-expanding metallic stents in the treatment of recurrent bulbar urethral strictures: long-term results. BJU Int2000; 86: 686. Google Scholar
- 14 : Long-term consequences of urethral stents. J Urol1993; 150: 853. Link, Google Scholar
From the Institute of Urology, London, United Kingdom, and Princess Alexandra Hospital (CC, DLN), Brisbane, Australia
