COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURES IN UROLOGY: EXPERIENCE WITH 2,407 PROCEDURES AT 4 GERMAN CENTERS
Abstract
Purpose:
The 4 most active centers of the laparoscopy working group of the German Urologic Association collected data about the complications associated with laparoscopic surgery in urology.
Materials and Methods:
At 4 centers 2,407 laparoscopies or retroperitoneoscopies were performed as of May 1998, including 776 for varicocelectomy, 259 for cryptorchidism, 481 for pelvic lymph node dissection, 351 for nephrectomy/heminephrectomy renal pathology, 139 for renal cyst resection, 58 for ureteral procedures, 44 for adrenalectomy, 41 for nephropexy, 41 for lymphocele fenestration, 40 for retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy and 187 for other operations. The complications were evaluated, listed according to the anatomical specificity and grouped with respect to the surgical step during laparoscopy.
Results:
A total of 107 complications (4.4%) occurred. The re-intervention rate was 0.8% and the mortality rate was 0.08%. The complication rate depended on the difficulty of the procedure and averaged 1.0, 3.9 and 9.2%, respectively, for easy, difficult and very difficult operations. The majority were vascular injuries (1.7%) and visceral lesions (1.1%) followed by complications of healing and infection (0.8%). Only 0.2% of complications was associated with the access technique (trocar insertion), whereas most occurred during dissection (2.9%). The complication rate was 13.3% of the first 100 procedures and subsequently averaged 3.6%.
Conclusions:
Critical documentation of experience from several institutions, especially for an analysis of complications of urological laparoscopy, is important for the development of this surgical technique. The overall complication rate is comparable to other specialties. Future technical developments in trocar insertion, tissue dissection and control of bleeding with our improved training program will further reduce the complication rate.
References
- 1 : Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg.1990; 212: 650. Google Scholar
- 2 :
Gynecological laparoscopy: complications in 23,000 laparoscopies-analysis, frequency, and management . In: . Oxford: Blackwell1995: 166. Google Scholar - 3 : Urological laparoscopic surgery. J. Urol.1991; 146: 941. Link, Google Scholar
- 4 : Laparoscopy in Urology. Min. Inv. Ther.1992; 1: 337. Google Scholar
- 5 : Advances in urological laparoscopy. J. Urol.1993; 154: 1275. Google Scholar
- 6 : Editorial: Laparoscopy at the crossroads. J. Urol.1994; 152: 1193. Link, Google Scholar
- 7 : Laparoscopic operations in urology clinics-questionnaire results. Urol. A1996; 35: 223. Google Scholar
- 8 : Fehler und Gefahren bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Chirurg.1993; 64: 212. Google Scholar
- 9 : Complications of laparoscopic surgery. J. Endourol.1992; 6: 95. Google Scholar
- 10 :
Complications of laparoscopy in urology . In: . Oxford: Blackwell1995: 158. Google Scholar - 11 :
Cause, effect, and management of general complications of laparoscopy . In: . Oxford: Blackwell1995: 147. Google Scholar - 12 :
Complications of laparoscopic surgery . In: . Stuttgart, New York: Thieme1996: 78. Google Scholar - 13 : Retroperitoneoscopy: Experience with 200 cases. J. Urol.1998; 160: 1265. Link, Google Scholar
- 14 : Complications of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. J. Urol.1993; 149: 322. Link, Google Scholar
- 15 : Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. J. Urol.1995; 154: 479. Link, Google Scholar
- 16 : Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of the laparoscopic working group of the German Urological Association. J. Urol.1998; 160: 18. Link, Google Scholar
- 17 : Advances in Laparoscopic Urology. Oxford: Blackwell1995. Google Scholar
- 18 : Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme1996. Google Scholar
- 19 Meyers, W.C. and the Southern Surgeons Club: A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. New Engl. J. Med. 342:1074. Google Scholar
- 20 Larson, G.M., Vitale, G.C., Casey, J., Evans, J.S., Gilliam, G., Heuser, L., McGee, C., Rao, M., Scherm, M.J., Voyles, C.R.: Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients. Amer. J. Surg. 163: 221. Google Scholar
- 21 : Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. J. Urol.1993; 150: 396. Link, Google Scholar
- 22 : Nephrectomy: a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur. Urol.1998; 13: 489. Google Scholar
- 23 :
Management of laparoscopic complications . In: . New York: Raven1994: 257. Google Scholar - 24 : Current findings in diagnostic laparoscopic evaluation of the nonpalpable testis. J. Urol.1998; 160: 1145. Link, Google Scholar
- 25 : Laparoscopic orchiopexy: procedure of choice for the nonpalpable testis. J. Urol.1998; 159: 2132. Link, Google Scholar
- 26 : Laparoscopic lymphocele drainage after renal transplantation. J. Urol.1993; 150: 316. Link, Google Scholar
- 27 Suzuki, K., Ushiyama, T., Kageyama, S., Usami, T., Mugiya, S., Fujita, K.: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy-transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach. J. Urol., part 2 159: 155–590, 19. Google Scholar
- 28 :
Pelviscopic surgery . In: . Stuttgart, New York: Thieme1996: 256. Google Scholar - 29 :
Complications in surgical laparoscopic interventions . In: . Blackwell: Oxford1995: 175. Google Scholar - 30 :
Laparoscopic electrosurgical issues: problems and solutions . In: . New York: Raven1994: 257. Google Scholar - 31 :
Laparoscopy: lasers and electrosurgery . In: . Stuttgart, New York: Thieme1996: 33. Google Scholar - 32 Frede, T., Hatzinger, M., Grenacher, L., Seemann, O., Rassweiler, J.: Experimental aspects of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques during retroperitoneoscopy. J. Endourol. 11: S54, abstract BS3-8. Google Scholar
- 33 :
Training in urologic laparoscopy . In: . Stuttgart, New York: Thieme1996: 50. Google Scholar
From the Departments of Urology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Neuruppin, Klinikum Heilbronn, Teaching Hospital of University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, University of Lubeck, Lubeck and University of the Charite, Berlin, Germany
Presented at annual meeting of American Urological Association, San Diego, California, June 2-5, 1998.
