Effect of Sperm Morphology on Pregnancy Success via Intrauterine Insemination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Purpose:
Men with abnormal sperm morphology are often counseled that natural conception and intrauterine insemination are ineffective, and in vitro fertilization is the only option. Our objective was to determine the effect of sperm morphology on the pregnancy success of intrauterine insemination.
Materials and Methods:
We systematically searched for studies published prior to January 2017 that 1) reported ultrasound verified clinical pregnancies per intrauterine insemination cycle, 2) assessed sperm morphology using the Kruger strict criteria and 3) described morphology at the greater than 4% and 4% or less and/or the 1% or greater and less than 1% thresholds. In all studies mean female age was between 25 and 40 years and mean total motile sperm count was greater than 10 million. Estimates were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.
Results:
Data were extracted from 20 observational studies involving a total of 41,018 cycles. When comparing men at the greater than 4% and 4% or less thresholds, the rate of ultrasound verified pregnancy per intrauterine insemination cycle was not statistically or clinically different (14.2% vs 12.1%, p = 0.06) and the risk difference was 3.0% (95% CI 1.4–4.6), indicating 3.0 additional pregnancies per 100 intrauterine insemination cycles. When comparing men at the 1% or greater and the less than 1% thresholds, there were no statistical or clinical differences in the rate of ultrasound verified pregnancy per cycle of intrauterine insemination (14.0% vs 13.9%, p = 0.97) or in the risk difference (1.6%, 95% CI –4.5–7.6).
Conclusions:
There appears to be no clinical difference in intrauterine insemination pregnancy success among men with normal and abnormal sperm morphology when accounting for total motile sperm count and female age. Abnormal sperm morphology alone should not exclude couples from attempting intrauterine insemination.
References
- 1 : Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril1986; 46: 1118. Google Scholar
- 2 World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Seman, 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization Press2010. Google Scholar
- 3 : Strict sperm morphology is predictive of intrauterine insemination success in cases of normal inseminating total motile sperm count. Fertil Steril2013; 100: S433. Google Scholar
- 4 : Reevaluation of the clinical importance of evaluating sperm morphology using strict criteria. Arch Androl2002; 48: 1. Google Scholar
- 5 : Impact of sperm morphology on the likelihood of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril2014; 102: 1584. Google Scholar
- 6 : The impact of sperm morphology on the outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles with gonadotropins in unexplained and male subfertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2016; 197: 120. Google Scholar
- 7 : Trends in sperm morphology after implementation of a quality improvement initiative. Fertil Steril2012; 98: S247. Google Scholar
- 8 : The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success. Fertil Steril1997; 67: 536. Google Scholar
- 9 : Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril2016; 105: 1462. Google Scholar
- 10 : Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet1996; 13: 569. Google Scholar
- 11 : Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination. Andrology2015; 3: 1088. Google Scholar
- 12 : Sperm morphology analysis (strict criteria) in male infertility is not a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination with husband's sperm. Fertil Steril1995; 63: 608. Google Scholar
- 13 : Assessing WHO 2010 semen analysis parameters for predicting pregnancy in an infertile population. Fertil Steril2014; 102: e348. Google Scholar
- 14 : Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications. Fertil Steril2011; 96: 1350. Google Scholar
- 15 : Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Hum Reprod1997; 12: 1458. Google Scholar
- 16 : Sperm DNA fragmentation as treatment guidance for infertile couples. Fertil Steril2016; 106: e78. Google Scholar
- 17 : Pre-wash sperm morphology predicts IUI outcomes by predicting post-wash total motile sperm count (TMSC): an analysis of 26,373 IUI cycles. Fertil Steril2015; 104: e239. Google Scholar
- 18 : Does sperm morphology affect the outcome of intrauterine insemination in patients with normal sperm concentration and motility?. Andrologia2012; 44: 299. Google Scholar
- 19 : Value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria for prediction of the outcome of artificial (intrauterine) insemination. Andrologia1995; 27: 143. Google Scholar
- 20 : Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update2001; 7: 495. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 21 Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril2015; 103: e18. Google Scholar
- 22 : The Optimal Evaluation of the Infertile Male: AUA Best Practice Statement. Linthicum: American Urological Association Education and Research2010. Google Scholar
- 23 : The continued existence of significant disparities in the technical practices of sperm morphology assessment and the clinical implications: results of a French questionnaire. Fertil Steril2017; 107: 365. Google Scholar
- 24 : The evaluation of pre and post processing semen analysis parameters at the time of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility and pregnancy rates based on stimulation agent. A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2014; 179: 159. Google Scholar
- 25 : Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril2011; 95: 915. Google Scholar
- 26 : Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods2017; 8: 290. Google Scholar
- 27 : Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research. Stat Med2002; 21: 1513. Google Scholar
- 28 : Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl2010; 12: 47. Google Scholar
- 29 : Men with a complete absence of normal sperm morphology exhibit high rates of success without assisted reproduction. Asian J Androl2017; 19: 39. Google Scholar
- 30 : Fifteen years of Belgian experience with external quality assessment of semen analysis. Andrology2016; 4: 1084. Google Scholar
