Advertisement
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.
No AccessJournal of UrologyPediatric Urology1 Aug 2016

Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome: Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Version

    View All Author Information

    Purpose:

    We sought to establish the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome for children with dysfunctional voiding and their parents.

    Materials and Methods:

    For this cross-sectional multicenter study the Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome was translated and cross-culturally adapted to Dutch following a standardized process. Patients 16 years or younger with dysfunctional voiding and their parents were recruited at pediatric, pediatric urology and pelvic floor physical therapy outpatient clinics. The reference group consisted of children 6 to 16 years old without dysfunctional voiding and their parents. All groups completed questionnaires. The evaluated measurement properties included discriminative ability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, interrater agreement, criterion validity using the Pediatric Incontinence Questionnaire and construct validity. A cutoff value for diagnosis of dysfunctional voiding was determined.

    Results:

    A total of 50 patients and 60 references and their parents were included in the study. The Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome showed good discriminative ability. A moderate internal consistency was found (Cronbach alpha 0.37-0.55). Test-retest reliability was moderate to good, and interrater agreement demonstrated good correlation between children and parents (ICC 0.85, 95% CI 0.79–0.89). A weak correlation with the Pediatric Incontinence Questionnaire was found in patients and construct validity was confirmed. Cutoff scores for dysfunctional voiding were 11 and 9 for patients and parents, respectively.

    Conclusions:

    The Dutch Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome displayed moderate to good reliability and validity properties for the patient and parent versions. Use of this instrument in clinical practice will support the assessment of dysfunctional voiding and facilitate international reporting of research results.

    References

    • 1 : Micturition habits and incontinence at age 17—reinvestigation of a cohort studied at age 7. Br J Urol1995; 76: 231. Google Scholar
    • 2 : One thousand video-urodynamic studies in children with non-neurogenic bladder sphincter dysfunction. BJU Int2001; 87: 575. Google Scholar
    • 3 : Management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: a stepwise approach. J Pediatr Urol2012; 8: 20. Google Scholar
    • 4 : Dysfunctional elimination syndromes—how closely linked are constipation and encopresis with specific lower urinary tract conditions?. J Urol2013; 190: 1015. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 5 : The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the Standardization Committee of the International Children's Continence Society. J Urol2014; 191: 1863. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 6 : The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol2000; 164: 1011. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 7 : Assessment of urinary symptoms in children with dysfunctional elimination syndrome. Int Urol Nephrol2007; 39: 425. Google Scholar
    • 8 : Dysfunctional voiding and incontinence scoring system: quantitative evaluation of incontinence symptoms in pediatric population. J Urol2005; 173: 969. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 9 : Historical clues to the complex of dysfunctional voiding, urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux. The International Reflux Study in Children. J Urol1992; 148: 1699. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 10 : Development of a symptom score for dysfunctional elimination syndrome. J Urol2009; 182: 1939. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 11 : Use of validated bladder/bowel dysfunction questionnaire in the clinical pediatric urology setting. J Urol2012; 188: 1578. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 12 : PinQ: a valid, reliable and reproducible quality-of-life measure in children with bladder dysfunction. J Pediatr Urol2006; 2: 185. Google Scholar
    • 13 : Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol1993; 46: 1417. Google Scholar
    • 14 : Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol2007; 60: 34. Google Scholar
    • 15 : Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods1996; 1: 30. Google Scholar
    • 16 : Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1986; 1: 307. Google Scholar
    • 17 : Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull1979; 86: 420. Google Scholar
    • 18 : Exploratory factory analysis and predicted probabilities of a Chinese version of Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn2012; 31: 1247. Google Scholar
    • 19 : Who should we trust in screening for lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: the parents or the child?. Urology2013; 82: 437. Google Scholar
    • 20 : Quality of life in childhood epilepsy: what is the level of agreement between youth and their parents?. Epilepsy Behav2009; 14: 407. Google Scholar
    • 21 : Parent-proxy and child self-reported health-related quality of life: using qualitative methods to explain the discordance. Qual Life Res2007; 16: 863. Google Scholar
    • 22 : The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res1998; 7: 387. Google Scholar
    Advertisement