Advertisement
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Jan 2015

5-Year Longitudinal Followup after Retropubic and Transobturator Mid Urethral Slings

    View All Author Information

    Purpose:

    Few studies have characterized longer-term outcomes after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings.

    Materials and Methods:

    Women completing 2-year participation in a randomized equivalence trial who had not undergone surgical re-treatment for stress urinary incontinence were invited to participate in a 5-year observational cohort. The primary outcome, treatment success, was defined as no re-treatment or self-reported stress incontinence symptoms. Secondary outcomes included urinary symptoms and quality of life, satisfaction, sexual function and adverse events.

    Results:

    Of 597 women 404 (68%) from the original trial enrolled in the study. Five years after surgical treatment success was 7.9% greater in women assigned to the retropubic sling compared to the transobturator sling (51.3% vs 43.4%, 95% CI −1.4, 17.2), not meeting prespecified criteria for equivalence. Satisfaction decreased during 5 years but remained high and similar between arms (retropubic sling 79% vs transobturator sling 85%, p=0.15). Urinary symptoms and quality of life worsened with time (p <0.001), and women with a retropubic sling reported greater urinary urgency (p=0.001), more negative impact on quality of life (p=0.02) and worse sexual function (p=0.001). There was no difference in the proportion of women experiencing at least 1 adverse event (p=0.17). Seven new mesh erosions were noted (retropubic sling 3, transobturator sling 4).

    Conclusions:

    Treatment success decreased during 5 years for retropubic and transobturator slings, and did not meet the prespecified criteria for equivalence with retropubic demonstrating a slight benefit. However, satisfaction remained high in both arms. Women undergoing a transobturator sling procedure reported more sustained improvement in urinary symptoms and sexual function. New mesh erosions occurred in both arms over time, although at a similarly low rate.

    References

    • 1 : Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol2009; 200: 521. Google Scholar
    • 2 : Ambulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol2010; 203: 497. Google Scholar
    • 3 : Trends in surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. Urology2009; 74: 283. Google Scholar
    • 4 : 5-Year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of Burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol2012; 187: 1324. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 5 : Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG2008; 115: 226. Google Scholar
    • 6 : Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: long-term results. J Urol2004; 172: 998. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 7 : Randomised trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long-term follow up. BJOG2008; 115: 219. Google Scholar
    • 8 : Four-year functional results of the suburethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a French prospective randomized multicentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes. World J Urol2012; 30: 117. Google Scholar
    • 9 : Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct2001; 12: S5. Google Scholar
    • 10 : Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Obstet Gynecol2012; 119: 321. Google Scholar
    • 11 : Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med2010; 362: 2066. Google Scholar
    • 12 : Treatment success of retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings at 24 months. J Urol2012; 188: 2281. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 13 : Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Gerontol1990; 45: M67. Google Scholar
    • 14 : Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res1994; 3: 291. Google Scholar
    • 15 : A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct2003; 14: 164. Google Scholar
    • 16 : Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol2003; 189: 98. Google Scholar
    • 17 : The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol1996; 175: 10. Google Scholar
    • 18 : Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg2004; 240: 205. Google Scholar
    • 19 : A comparison of intent-to-treat and per-protocol results in antibiotic non-inferiority trials. Stat Med2005; 24: 1. Google Scholar
    • 20 : Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2009; : CD006375. Google Scholar
    • 21 : Patient satisfaction with stress incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn2010; 29: 1403. Google Scholar
    • 22 : Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol2004; 104: 805. Google Scholar
    • 23 : Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence. N Engl J Med2013; 369: 1124. Google Scholar
    Advertisement