Abstract
Purpose:
Several radical prostatectomy series have linked small prostates with high grade cancer based on the hypothesis that a small prostate results from a low androgen milieu that selects for less hormone dependent, more aggressive tumors. We previously reported that this association resulted from ascertainment bias from the performance characteristics of prostate specific antigen rather than from tumor biology in our radical prostatectomy cohort. In this study we analyzed this association in a more generalized population of men who underwent prostate needle biopsy.
Materials and Methods:
The prostate needle biopsy database at our institution was queried for all initial biopsies. Included patient characteristics were age, race, family history of prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination and prostate volume in ml on transrectal ultrasound. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the influence of prostate volume on the odds of high grade cancer.
Results:
The study population included 1,295 patients during 2000 to 2010, of whom 582 (44.9%) had prostate cancer and 398 (30.7%) had high grade cancer. When all patients were pooled, the OR for high grade cancer was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.92) for each 10 ml increase in prostate volume. When patients were divided by clinical T stage, the corresponding ORs for those with T1c disease was 0.83 (95% CI 0.74–0.93) and for those with T2 or greater disease it was 0.99 (0.98–1.00).
Conclusions:
The association between small prostates and high grade cancer exists only in men with clinical T1c (normal digital rectal examination) prostate cancer. It likely resulted from ascertainment bias due to the performance characteristics of prostate specific antigen rather than tumor biology.
References
- 1 : Prostate size and risk of high grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: A SEARCH database study. J Clin Oncol2005; 23: 7546. Google Scholar
- 2 : Prostate volume and adverse prostate cancer features: fact not artifact. Eur J Cancer2007; 43: 2669. Google Scholar
- 3 : Smaller prostate size predicts high grade prostate cancer at final pathology. J Urol2010; 184: 930. Link, Google Scholar
- 4 : Independent prognostic factors in patients with metastatic (stage D2) prostate cancer: the Zoladex Study Group. JAMA1991; 265: 618. Google Scholar
- 5 : Small prostate size and high grade disease—biology or artifact?. J Urol2011; 185: 2108. Link, Google Scholar
- 6 : Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. Urology1997; 49: 55. Google Scholar
- 7 : The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. New Engl J Med2003; 349: 213. Google Scholar
- 8 : Evidence of biopsy derived grade artifact among larger prostate glands. J Urol2006; 175: 505. Link, Google Scholar
- 9 : Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies. J Urol2007; 178: 111. Link, Google Scholar
- 10 : Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J Urol1992; 147: 815. Link, Google Scholar
- 11 : The performance of prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density and transition zone density in the era of extended biopsy schemes. J Urol2008; 179: 1756. Link, Google Scholar
Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford and Division of Urology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (RS), San Jose, California
