Advertisement

Purpose:

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of percutaneous embolization for the treatment of grade 5 renal injuries secondary to blunt trauma in patients who are hemodynamically unstable.

Materials and Methods:

This study was a retrospective analysis of grade 5 blunt renal trauma managed with percutaneous embolization between October 2004 and December 2007. Technical success was defined as complete occlusion of all renovascular bleeding at the end of the procedure. Clinical success was defined as the stabilization of vital signs and absence of need for further surgical or radiological intervention.

Results:

Nine patients (6 male and 3 female) with grade 5 renal injury secondary to blunt trauma were treated with percutaneous embolization. These patients did not require surgery for other intra-abdominal injuries. Mean patient age was 30 years (median 34, range 5 to 56, SD 15). Mean hospital length of stay was 18 days (median 13, range 5 to 46, SD 14). Mean units of packed red blood cells transfused for each patient was 6 (median 5, range 0 to 17, SD 5) with 2 receiving none. Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%) and all showed complete resolution of active extravasation on angiography. Clinical success was achieved in all patients (100%) with none requiring further intervention.

Conclusions:

Percutaneous embolization for the management of grade 5 renal injuries is safe and effective with an excellent success rate in our series. The overall complication rate is minimal. Larger studies with long-term followup are needed to assure durability and efficacy.

References

  • 1 : Selective nonoperative management of blunt grade 5 renal injury. J Urol2000; 164: 27. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2 : Traumatic renal artery occlusion: a 15-year review. J Trauma1998; 45: 557. Google Scholar
  • 3 : Mortality and renal salvage after renovascular trauma: a review of 94 patients treated in a 20 year period. Am J Surg1983; 146: 848. Google Scholar
  • 4 : Nonoperative treatment of major blunt renal lacerations with urinary extravasation. J Urol1997; 157: 2056. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5 : A conservative approach to major blunt renal lacerations with urinary extravasation and devitalized renal segments. BJU Int2001; 87: 290. Google Scholar
  • 6 : Nonoperative management of blunt renal trauma: a prospective study. Am Surg2002; 68: 1097. Google Scholar
  • 7 : Controversial aspects of blunt renal trauma. J Trauma1977; 17: 662. Google Scholar
  • 8 : Stab wounds of the renal artery branches: angiographic diagnosis and treatment by embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol1989; 152: 1231. Google Scholar
  • 9 : Embolization in traumatic intrarenal vascular injuries. Clin Radiol1991; 43: 262. Google Scholar
  • 10 : Blunt renal trauma: minimally invasive management with microcatheter embolization—experience in nine patients. Radiology2002; 223: 723. Google Scholar
  • 11 : Minimally invasive endovascular techniques to treat acute renal hemorrhage. J Urol2008; 179: 2248. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12 : Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma1989; 29: 1664. Google Scholar
  • 13 : Practice management guidelines for the management of genitourinary trauma: The EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. www.east.org/tpg/GUmgmt.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2008. Google Scholar
  • 14 : Evaluation and management of renal injuries: consensus statement of the renal trauma subcommittee. BJU Int2004; 93: 937. Google Scholar
  • 15 : Renal and ureteral urauma. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology. Edited by . Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co2007: 1274. chapt 39,. Google Scholar
  • 16 : Conservative management of renal trauma: a review. Urology2007; 70: 623. Google Scholar

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and the Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee

Advertisement