Advertisement
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Jul 2008

Proposal of an Improved Prognostic Classification for pT3 Renal Cell Carcinoma

View All Author Information

Purpose:

The prognostic accuracy of the current TNM 2002 staging system for locally advanced renal cell carcinoma has been questioned. To contribute to the development of a more accurate classification for this stage of disease we assessed the correlation between patterns of invasion in the pT3 category and outcomes in a large multi-institutional series.

Materials and Methods:

Pathological data and clinical followup on 513 pT3 renal cell carcinoma cases treated with radical nephrectomy between 1983 and 2005 at 3 Italian academic centers were retrospectively reviewed. Cause specific survival rates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results:

Estimated overall 5-year cause specific survival was 50.1% at a median followup of 61.5 months in survivors. The current TNM classification was not a significant outcome prognosticator. Patients with a tumor invading only the perirenal or sinus fat were at lowest risk for death from the disease. Patients at intermediate risk had tumors with invasion of the venous system alone. Simultaneous perirenal fat and sinus fat invasion or perirenal fat and vascular invasion as well as adrenal gland involvement characterized high risk tumors. Low risk tumors could be further divided into 2 groups with different outcomes based on a size cutoff of 7 cm. Our classification was a significant predictor of survival on multivariate analysis as well as M stage, N stage, Fuhrman grade and tumor size.

Conclusions:

We confirm that the prognostic usefulness of the current 2002 TNM system for pT3 renal cell carcinoma is limited. We have identified 4 groups of tumors with distinct patterns of invasion and significantly different survival probabilities in this category. Large prospective series are needed to validate these findings.

References

  • 1 : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. New York: Wiley-Liss Publications2002. Google Scholar
  • 2 : Reclassification of patients with pT3 and pT4 renal cell carcinoma improves prognostic accuracy. Cancer2005; 104: 53. Google Scholar
  • 3 : Proposal for reclassification of the TNM staging system in patients with locally advanced (pT3–4) renal cell carcinoma according to the cancer-related outcome. Eur Urol2007; 51: 722. Google Scholar
  • 4 : A new staging system for locally advanced (pT3–4) renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter European study including 2,000 patients. J Urol2007; 178: 418. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5 : Prognostic relevance of tumour size in T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre experience. Eur Urol2007; 52: 155. Google Scholar
  • 6 : Should direct ipsilateral adrenal invasion from renal cell carcinoma be classified as pT3a?. J Urol2005; 173: 918. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7 : Validation of an integrated staging system toward improved prognostication of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma in an international population. J Urol2003; 170: 2221. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8 : Redefining pT3 renal cell carcinoma in the modern era: a proposal for a revision of the current TNM primary tumor classification system. Cancer2007; 109: 2439. Google Scholar
  • 9 : Prognostic significance of tumor thrombus level in patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumor thrombus extension: Is all T3b the same?. J Urol2004; 171: 598. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10 : Renal sinus involvement in renal cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol2000; 24: 451. Google Scholar
  • 11 : Is renal sinus fat invasion the same as perinephric fat invasion for pT3a renal cell carcinoma?. J Urol2005; 174: 1218. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12 : Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol1982; 6: 655. Google Scholar
  • 13 : World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press2004. Google Scholar
  • 14 : Reassessing the current TNM lymph node staging for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol2006; 49: 324. Google Scholar
  • 15 : Chemotherapy with FUDR in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Urol (Paris)1997; 31: 159. Google Scholar
  • 16 : Evaluation of a protocol for examining nephrectomy specimens with renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Pathol2003; 56: 374. Google Scholar
  • 17 : Prognostic significance of venous thrombus in renal cell carcinoma: Are renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement different?. J Urol2004; 171: 588. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18 : Cancer specific survival for patients with pT3 renal cell carcinoma—can the 2002 primary tumor classification be improved?. J Urol2005; 173: 716. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 19 : An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol2002; 168: 2395. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 20 : Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol2000; 163: 1090. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 21 : Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a. J Urol2005; 173: 33. LinkGoogle Scholar
Advertisement