Prognostic Stratification of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma by Tumor Size
is accompanied by
- CpG Hypermethylation of the UCHL1 Gene Promoter is Associated With Pathogenesis and Poor Prognosis in Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Antisense Attenuation of p21 Sensitizes Kidney Cancer to Apoptosis in Response to Conventional DNA Damaging Chemotherapy Associated With Enhancement of Phospho-p53
- A Pilot Trial of Vascular Targeted Photodynamic Therapy for Renal Tissue
Abstract
Purpose:
Recent retrospective studies have challenged the current TNM classification of 7.0 cm to distinguish between T1 and T2 tumors. We reevaluated the optimal tumor size cutoff point that independently differentiates patient prognosis beyond the other accepted prognostic features.
Materials and Methods:
From 1990 to October 2006, 398 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma (T1–T2, N0, M0) were followed prospectively. Median followup was 5.3 years and 37 patients died of tumor related causes. The optimal tumor cutoff point was calculated and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for the effects of Fuhrman grade, tumor type, sex, age and Karnofsky performance status on cancer specific survival. Sensitivity analysis included all 66 patients with elective nephron sparing surgery.
Results:
Univariate analysis supported 7 cm as the optimal cutoff point for prognostic stratification (p = 0.002). The 4 cm cutoff point that is used to distinguish between stage T1a and T1b could not be confirmed with analogous statistical significance (p = 0.20). On multivariate analysis tumor size dichotomized at 7 cm was an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.46–5.73, p = 0.002), as was Fuhrman grade 3 (HR 3.68, 95% CI 1.37–9.83, p = 0.010) and age older than 60 years (HR 3.64, 95% CI 1.63–8.14, p = 0.002). The inclusion of patients with elective nephron sparing surgery confirmed these results.
Conclusions:
Univariate and multivariate analyses of our patient cohort undergoing radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma showed no cutoff point other than 7 cm to be more suitable for distinguishing between T1 and T2 tumors, supporting the current TNM classification. In T1 tumors the analysis did not allow a clear dichotomization of tumor size in this group.
References
- 1 TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (Livre de Poche). Geneva: International Union Against Cancer1968. Google Scholar
- 2 : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Geneva: International Union Against Cancer1974. Google Scholar
- 3 : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Berlin: Springer-Verlag1987. Google Scholar
- 4 : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 5th ed. Cancer1997; 80: 1803. Google Scholar
- 5 : AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. New York: Springer-Verlag2002. Google Scholar
- 6 : Proposal for revision of the TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma. Cancer2005; 104: 2116. Google Scholar
- 7 : Neoplasm staging and organ-confined renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Eur Urol2004; 46: 559. Google Scholar
- 8 : Proposal for reclassification of the TNM staging system in patients with locally advanced (pT3–4) renal cell carcinoma according to the cancer-related outcome. Eur Urol2007; 51: 722. Google Scholar
- 9 : Renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extension into the vena cava: prospective long-term followup. J Urol2007; 177: 1703. Link, Google Scholar
- 10 : Prognostic features of pathologic stage T1 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Urology2002; 59: 532. Google Scholar
- 11 : The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J Pathol1997; 183: 131. Google Scholar
- 12 : Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer-Verlag2000. Google Scholar
- 13 : Prognostic parameters in renal cell carcinoma—a new approach. Eur Urol1989; 16: 416. Google Scholar
- 14 : Renal cell carcinoma: comparison of the TNM and Robson stage groupings. J Surg Oncol1995; 59: 186. Google Scholar
- 15 : Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol1999; 162: 1930. Link, Google Scholar
- 16 : Prognostic importance of tumor size for localized conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma: assessment of TNM T1 and T2 tumor categories and comparison with other prognostic parameters. Cancer2002; 94: 658. Google Scholar
- 17 : Prognostic impact of tumor size on pT2 renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter experience. J Urol2007; 178: 35. Link, Google Scholar
- 18 : Tumor-size cutoff point for prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology2004; 63: 235. Google Scholar
- 19 : Editorial comment. Urology2004; 63: 239. Google Scholar
- 20 : Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability?. Urology2004; 63: 1050. Google Scholar
