Advertisement
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.
Advertisement

Purpose:

A urethral stricture recurring after repeat urethrotomy challenges even a skilled urologist. To address the question of whether to repeat urethrotomy or perform open reconstructive surgery, we retrospectively review a series of 93 patients comparing those who underwent primary repair versus those who had undergone urethrotomy and underwent secondary treatment.

Materials and Methods:

From 1975 to 1998, 93 males between age 13 and 78 years (mean 39) underwent surgical treatment for bulbar urethral stricture. In 46 (49%) of the patients urethroplasty was performed as primary repair, and in 47 (51%) after previously failed urethrotomy. The strictures were localized in the bulbous urethra without involvement of penile or membranous tracts. The etiology was ischemic in 37 patients, traumatic in 23, unknown in 17 and inflammatory in 16. To simplify evaluation of the results, the clinical outcome was considered either a success or a failure at the time any postoperative procedure was needed, including dilation.

Results:

In our 93 patients primary urethroplasty had a final success rate of 85%, and after failed urethrotomy 87%. Previously failed urethrotomy did not influence the long-term outcome of urethroplasty. The long-term results of different urethroplasty techniques had a final success rate ranging from 77% to 96%.

Conclusions:

We conclude that failed urethrotomy does not condition the long-term result of surgical repair. With extended followup, the success rate of urethroplasty decreases with time but it is in fact still higher than that of urethrotomy.

References

  • 1 : Analysis of factors contributing to success or failure of 1-stage urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease. J Urol1994; 151: 869. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2 : Long-term results of anterior and posterior urethroplasty with actuarial evaluation of the success rates. J Urol1997; 158: 1380. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 : The actuarial success rate of surgical treatment of urethral strictures. J Urol1994; 151: 360A. abstract 529. Google Scholar
  • 4 : Results and complications of urethroplasty and its future. Br J Urol1993; 71: 322. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 : The long-term results of skin inlay urethroplasty. Br J Urol1995; 75: 59. Google Scholar
  • 6 : Patch graft urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease. J Urol1976; 115: 681. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7 : Urethroplasty using the pedicled island flap technique in complicated urethral strictures. J Urol1991; 146: 40. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8 : Excision and anastomotic repair for urethral stricture disease: experience with 150 cases. Eur Urol1997; 32: 433. Google Scholar
  • 9 : The long-term follow-up of the urethroplasty for non-traumatic urethral strictures. J Urol1996; 155: 501A. abstract 762. Google Scholar
  • 10 : Use of free grafts in urethral stricture reconstruction. J Urol1996; 155: 1912. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 : Excisional repair of urethral stricture. Follow-up of 90 patients. Urology1986; 27: 233. Google Scholar
  • 12 : Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty for repair of bulbar urethral stricture. J Urol1999; 161: 815. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13 : Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa in adult bulbourethral strictures. J Urol1998; 160: 1307. LinkGoogle Scholar

From the Department of Urology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Department of Urology, Hospital S. Raffaele, Milan and Center for Urethral and Genitalia Reconstructive Surgery, Arezzo, Italy