Advertisement
No AccessUrology Practicethe Specialty1 May 2018

The Representation of Women in Urological Leadership

    View All Author Information

    Introduction:

    While urology has historically been a male dominated field, the number of female urologists is increasing. In 2015 women made up 7.7% of practicing urologists and 17.1% of urologists younger than age 45 years. In the medical field overall females have been markedly underrepresented in leadership positions. We assess the current prevalence of women in urological leadership roles.

    Methods:

    Using data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and society and journal leadership boards, we compiled a list of editorial staff, boards of directors, department chairs and program directors in July 2016. Queried societies included the American Board of Urology, American Urological Association, Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons, Societies for Pediatric Urology, Society of Urologic Oncology, Society of Academic Urologists, Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction, and the Large Urology Group Practice Association. Editorial boards examined were from The Journal of Urology® and Urology. We also included committee members who wrote American Urological Association guidelines between 2011 and 2016.

    Results:

    Women represent 10% of leadership positions in the queried organizations and are underrepresented in advanced leadership positions. There were no women on the American Urological Association board of directors and women made up 1.6% of department chairs. Of the committees 76% included at least 1 woman. Overall, 75% of women on committees were urologists. By comparison, 95% of men on committees were urologists.

    Conclusions:

    Overall, women are fairly represented in a broad cross-section of leadership roles. Women are less well represented in the upper echelon of urological leadership, especially department chairs.

    References

    • 1 : A survey of women urology residents regarding career choice and practice challenges. J Womens Health (Larchmt)2009; 18: 1867. Google Scholar
    • 2 American Urological Association: Urology Match Demographic Data for 2015. Available at https://www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/specialty-match/2015-Urology-Match-Statistics.pdf. Accessed October 3, 2016. Google Scholar
    • 3 The State of the Urology Workforce and Practice in the United States 2015. Linthicum, Maryland: American Urological Association2016. Google Scholar
    • 4 The State of Women in Academic Medicine: The Pipeline and Pathways to Leadership. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges2014. Google Scholar
    • 5 : Burnout in chairs of academic departments of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology2007; 114: 2350. Google Scholar
    • 6 : Women in academic medicine. Acad Med2016; 91: 1045. Google Scholar
    • 7 : Status of women in urology: based on a report to the Society of University Urologists. J Urol2005; 173: 560. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 8 : Women in academic medicine. Combining career and family. N Engl J Med1989; 321: 1511. Google Scholar
    • 9 : Women in academic general surgery. Acad Med2004; 79: 310. Google Scholar
    • 10 : Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med1998; 129: 532. Google Scholar
    • 11 : Conflicts associated with physicians’ pregnancies. Am J Psychiatry1983; 140: 902. Google Scholar
    • 12 : Career Mobility in a Corporate Hierarchy. New York: Academic Press1984. Google Scholar
    • 13 : Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. J Appl Psychol1991; 76: 256. Google Scholar
    • 14 : Sex differences in physician salary in US public medical schools. JAMA Intern Med2016; 176: 1294. Google Scholar
    • 15 : A mixed-methods investigation of the motivations, goals, and aspirations of male and female academic medical faculty. Acad Med2016; 91: 1089. Google Scholar
    • 16 : Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA2006; 296: 1103. Google Scholar
    • 17 : Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med1991; 154: 423. Google Scholar
    • 18 : Women and mentoring in collegiate athletics. Mentor Tutoring2016; 24: 346. Google Scholar
    • 19 : Effect of same-sex and cross-sex role models on the subsequent academic productivity of scholars. Am Psychol1979; 34: 407. Google Scholar
    • 20 : Sex of authority role models and achievement by men and women: leadership performance and recognition. J Pers Soc Psychol1985; 49: 636. Google Scholar
    • 21 : Women directors on corporate boards: from tokenism to critical mass. J Bus Ethics2011; 102: 299. Google Scholar
    • 22 : The case for sex- and gender-specific medicine. JAMA Intern Med2014; 174: 1348. Google Scholar
    • 23 : Fifth Report: Women and Medicine. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services1995. Google Scholar
    • 24 : Career development for women in academic medicine: multiple interventions in a department of medicine. JAMA1996; 276: 898. Google Scholar
    Advertisement