Phallic Decoration in Paleolithic Art: Genital Scarification, Piercing and Tattoos
Abstract
Purpose:
The primitive anthropological meaning of genital ornamentation is not clearly defined and the origin of penile intervention for decorative purposes is lost in time. Corporeal decoration was practiced in the Upper Paleolithic period. We discuss the existing evidence on the practice of phallic piercing, scarring and tattooing in prehistory.
Materials and Methods:
We studied the archaeological and artistic evidence regarding explicit genital male representations in portable art made in Europe approximately 38,000 to 11,000 years ago with special emphasis on decorations suggesting genital ornamentation.
Results:
Archaeological evidence that has survived to our day includes 42 phallic pieces, of which 30 (71.4%) show intentional marks to a different extent with a probable decorative purpose. Of these ornamental elements 18 (60%) were recovered from the upper Magdalenian period (11,000 to 12,700 years ago) in France and Spain, and 23 (76.7%) belong to the category of perforated batons. Decorations show lines (70% of objects), plaques (26.7%), dots/holes (23.3%) or even human/animal forms (13.3%). These designs most probably represent skin scarification, cutting, piercing and tattooing. Notably there are some technical similarities between the motifs represented and some designs present in symbolic cave wall art. This evidence may show the anthropological origin of current male genital piercing and tattooing.
Conclusions:
European Paleolithic art shows decoration explicitly represented in a high proportion of portable art objects with a phallic form that have survived to our day. Decorative rituals of male genital tattooing, piercing and scarification may have been practiced during Paleolithic times.
References
- 1 : Significado de la erección, la genitalidad y otras representaciones de índole urológico en el imaginario paleolítico. Arch Esp Urol2007; 60: 845. Google Scholar
- 2 : Diversidad y sentido de las representaciones masculinas fálicas paleolíticas de Europa occidental. Actas Urol Esp2006; 30: 1. Google Scholar
- 3 : Male genital representation in Paleolithic art: erection and circumcision before history. Urology2009; 74: 10. Google Scholar
- 4 : Erection and circumcision represented in Palaeolithic art in Europe. Eur Urol2009; 8: 162. Google Scholar
- 5 : Sexo en Piedra: Sexualidad, Reproducción y Erotismo en Época Paleolítica. Madrid: Luzán5, S.A. de Ediciones2005. Google Scholar
- 6 : Musée des Antiquetés Nationales. Collection Piette. Art mobilier préhistorique. Paris: Éditions des Musées Nationaux1964. Google Scholar
- 7 : Les origines du graphisme symbolique: Essai d'analyse des écritures en Préhistoire. Paris: Éditions des Musées Nationaux1980. Google Scholar
- 8 : La collection Piette. Saint-Germain-en-Laye: Musée d'Archéologie nationale2008. Google Scholar
- 9 : Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza1973. Google Scholar
- 10 : El arte mueble paleolítico cantábrico: contexto y análisis interno: Monografías No. 16. Madrid: Centro de Investigación y Museo de Altamira1986. Google Scholar
- 11 : Liège: Préhistoire liégeoise A.S.B.L1990. Google Scholar
- 12 : Liège: Préhistoire liégeoise A.S.B.L1990. Google Scholar
- 13 :
Nouvelle théorie d'utilisation des bâtons troués préhistoriques . In: Centenaire de la Préhistoire en Périgord (1864–1964). Périgueux: Bulletin de la Société Historique et Archéologique du Périgord1965: 55. Google Scholar - 14 : Le sexe au temps des Cro-Magnons. Périgueux: Pilote24 édition2007. Google Scholar
- 15 : Les bâtons percés réveil d'une hypothèse abandonnée. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de l'Ariège1976; 31: 47. Google Scholar
- 16 : Les bâtons percés: Décors énigmatiques et fonction possible. Gallia préhistoire2001; 43: 101. Google Scholar
- 17 : Réalisme de l'image masculine paléolithique: L'homme des Origines. Grenoble: Jérôme Million1996. Google Scholar
- 18 : Sexualidad y reproducción en época glaciar a partir de las observaciones procedentes del arte paleolítico. Rev Urol2003; 4: 133. Google Scholar
- 19 : Sexualidad y erotismo en la Prehistoria. Rev Int Androl2008; 6: 127. Google Scholar
- 20 : The Nature of Paleolithic Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press2005. Google Scholar
- 21 : Looking and learning: Upper Palaeolithic art and information gathering. World Archaeol1988; 19: 119. Google Scholar
- 22 : Sur l'usage probable de la peinture corporelle dans certains tribus moustériennes. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française1952; 49: 169. Google Scholar
- 23 : Red ochre and human evolution: a case of discussion. Curr Anthropol1980; 21: 631. Google Scholar
- 24 : The examination of use marks on some Magdalenian end scrapers. Prehistoric Roman Studies Br Museum1971; 1: 176. Google Scholar
- 25 : Pour une étude méthodologique des colorants préhistoriques. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française1983; 80: 104. Google Scholar
- 26 : Tatuar la piel, labrar el cuerpo. Zona Arqueológica2008; 7: 28. Google Scholar
- 27 :
Ga'anda scarification: a model for art and identity . In: Marks of Civilization: Artistic Transformations of the Human Body. Edited by . Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History, University of California1995: 57. Google Scholar - 28 : Manuel d'ethnographie. Paris: Editions Sociales1967. Collection Petite Bibliothèque Payot. Google Scholar
- 29 :
Hawaian Tattoo: A Conjuction of Genealogy and Aesthetics . In: Marks of Civilization: Artistic Transformations of the Human Body. Edited by . Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History, University of California1995: 157. Google Scholar - 30 : Tattoos: invulnerability and power in Shan cosmology. Am Ethnol1987; 14: 693. Google Scholar
