Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction During Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Purpose:
Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction following radical prostatectomy was designed to improve early urinary continence. We executed a randomized clinical trial to test this conjecture in men undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted a phase II randomized clinical trial intended to detect a 25% difference in 3-month continence outcomes defined by a patient response of 0 or 1 to question 5 of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire urinary domain, comparing standard running vesicourethral anastomosis (controls) to posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction followed by standard running vesicourethral anastomosis (posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction treated). Patients had clinically localized prostate cancer and were blinded. Surgeons were notified of computer randomization after prostate excision. Further continence outcomes were assessed by analysis of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire questions 1 and 12, International Prostate Symptom Score and 24-hour pad weights. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05
Results:
A total of 94 patients were randomized, 47 to each arm. Preoperative clinical and functional variables were equivalent between study arms. There were no complications associated with either anastomotic technique. Of the 87 evaluable patients 62 (71.3%) met our 3-month continence definition. The null hypothesis was not rejected as 33 (81%) controls and 29 (63%) posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction treated patients were continent at 3 months (chi-square p = 0.07, Fisher exact p = 0.1). Likewise there was no significant difference between arms in 24-hour pad weights (p = 0.14), International Prostate Symptom Score (p = 0.4), absence of daily leaks (p = 0.4) or perception of urinary function (p = 0.4).
Conclusions:
In this randomized clinical trial posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction offered no advantage for return of early continence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
References
- 1 : Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA1995; 273: 129. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2 : Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med2008; 358: 1250. Google Scholar
- 3 : Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol2010; 183: 871. Link, Google Scholar
- 4 : Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol2006; 175: 2201. Link, Google Scholar
- 5 : Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int2008; 101: 1135. Google Scholar
- 6 : Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol2007; 52: 376. Google Scholar
- 7 : Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology2007; 69: 726. Google Scholar
- 8 : Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol2008; 180: 1018. Link, Google Scholar
- 9 : Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology2003; 61: 699. Google Scholar
- 10 : Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol1996; 156: 1707. Link, Google Scholar
- 11 : Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology2000; 56: 899. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12 : In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J Urol1998; 160: 1301. Link, Google Scholar
- 13 : Installation of telerobotic surgery and initial experience with telerobotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int2005; 96: 34. Google Scholar
- 14 : Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol2007; 51: 45. Google Scholar
- 15 : Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: a single-team experience of 100 cases. J Endourol2003; 17: 785. Google Scholar
- 16 : The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments. J Urol2004; 171: 1216. Link, Google Scholar
- 17 : Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. J Urol2000; 164: 242. Google Scholar
- 18 : Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial. Eur Urol2010; 58: 84. Google Scholar
- 19 : Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J Urol2005; 173: 2099. Link, Google Scholar
Department of Urology, George Washington University, Washington, D. C.
