Advertisement
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.
Advertisement
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult urology1 May 2006

Effect of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use on the Incidence of Erectile Dysfunction

    View All Author Information

    Purpose:

    We estimated the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use on the incidence of erectile dysfunction.

    Materials and Methods:

    The target population consisted of men 50, 60 or 70 years old residing in the study area in Finland in 1994. Questionnaires were mailed to 3,143 men in 1994 and to 2,864 men 5 years later. The followup sample consisted of 1,683 men who responded to baseline and followup questionnaires. We estimated the effect of NSAIDs on the incidence of ED in men free from moderate or complete ED at baseline (in 1,126). ED was assessed by 2 questions on subject ability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for intercourse. Confounding was assessed by stratification and by adjustment in multivariate Poisson regression model.

    Results:

    The incidence of ED was 93 cases per 1,000 person-years in men who used and 35 in those who did not use NSAIDs. Among men with arthritis, the most common indication for NSAID use, ED incidence was 97 cases per 1,000 in those using and 52 in men who did not use NSAIDs. Compared with men who did not use NSAIDs and were free from arthritis, the relative risk of ED after controlling for the effects of age, smoking, and other medical conditions and medications was higher in men who used NSAIDs but were free of arthritis (IDR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5) and in those who used NSAIDs and had arthritis (IDR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1). The relative risk was only somewhat higher in men who had arthritis but did not use NSAIDs (IDR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8).

    Conclusions:

    The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increases the risk of ED and the effect is independent of indication.

    References

    • 1 : An investigation of erectile dysfunction in Gwent, Wales. BJU Int2001; 88: 551. Google Scholar
    • 2 : Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlatesresults of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol1994; 151: 54. AbstractGoogle Scholar
    • 3 : Sexual dysfunction in 1,274 European men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms. J Urol2003; 169:: 2257. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 4 : Drug-related erectile dysfunction. Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev1999; 18: 5. Google Scholar
    • 5 : Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and its correlates in Egypt: a community-based study. Int J Impot Res2003; 15:: 237. Google Scholar
    • 6 : Sexual function in ankylosing spondylitis: a study of 65 men. J Urol2004; 171:: 1598. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 7 : Sexual dysfunction among patients with arthritis. Clin Rheumatol1988; 7: 50. Google Scholar
    • 8 : Effect of chronic diseases on the incidence of erectile dysfunction. Urology2003; 62: 1097. Google Scholar
    • 9 : New directions in pain management. Drugs Today (Barc)2002; 38: 135. Google Scholar
    • 10 : Clinical aspects of depression in chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain1991; 7: 79. Google Scholar
    • 11 : Relation between psychosocial risk factors and incident erectile dysfunction: prospective results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Am J Epidemiol2000; 152: 533. Google Scholar
    • 12 : Measurement of erectile dysfunction in population-based studies: the use of a single question self-assessment in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Int J Impot Res2000; 12: 197. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 : Prevalence and independent risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Spain: results of the Epidemiologia De La Disfuncion Erectil Masculina Study. J Urol2001; 166:: 569. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 14 : Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in France: results of an epidemiological survey of a representative sample of 1004 men. Eur Urol2002; 42:: 382. Google Scholar