Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk Identification
Abstract
Purpose:
Conventional ultrasound systems operate at 6 to 9 MHz and serve as the standard of care to guide prostate biopsies. We present a protocol using a novel high resolution (29 MHz) transrectal prostate micro-ultrasound system. This protocol includes a scoring system to assess the risk of prostatic carcinoma and enable real-time targeted biopsies.
Materials and Methods:
The ExactVu™ system is currently being used in a multisite, 2,000-patient, randomized clinical trial. Cine loops of 400 biopsies from this trial were used to create the PRI-MUS™ (prostate risk identification using micro-ultrasound) protocol and risk scale. Validation was performed in an independent, pathology blinded set of 100 cines. Three of the 5 investigators performing this validation were familiar with micro-ultrasound but naïve to the PRI-MUS protocol and they received only 1 hour of training.
Results:
Each increase in risk score demonstrated a 10.1% increase (95% CI 9.3–10.8) in the probability of clinically significant cancer. The risk score also increased with Gleason sum and cancer length with a slope of 0.15 (95% CI 0.09–0.21) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.43–0.73), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 37%, respectively, and the mean ± SD ROC AUC was 60% ± 2%. The protocol was more accurate for detecting high grade disease (Gleason sum greater than 7) with a peak AUC of 74% (mean 66%).
Conclusions:
The new resolution of the micro-ultrasound platform paired with the PRI-MUS protocol shows promise for real-time visualization of suspicious lesions and targeting of biopsies. The improved performance of the protocol in more significant disease is consistent with the focus of the field on decreasing insignificant diagnoses and detecting high risk disease early.
References
- 1 : High-resolution transrectal ultrasound: pilot study of a novel technique for imaging clinically localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol2013; 32: 34.e27. Google Scholar
- 2 : Prostatic evaluation by transrectal sonography with histopathologic correlation: the echopenic appearance of early carcinoma. Radiology1986; 158: 97. Google Scholar
- 3 :
The prostate . In: Diagnostic Ultrasound, 4th ed. Edited by . Maryland Heights: Mosby2011: 392. Google Scholar - 4 : Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol1989; 142: 1008. Link, Google Scholar
- 5 : Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions. World J Urol2004; 22: 357. Google Scholar
- 6 : Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer. J Urol1994; 152: 1506. Link, Google Scholar
- 7 : Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy. J Urol2004; 171: 1089. Link, Google Scholar
- 8 : Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol2006; 175: 485. Link, Google Scholar
- 9 : Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer. Rev Urol2008; 10: 262. Google Scholar
- 10 : Use of extended pattern technique for initial prostate biopsy. J Urol2005; 174: 505. Link, Google Scholar
- 11 : Confidence limits made easy: interval estimation using a substitution method. Am J Epidemiol1998; 147: 8. Google Scholar
- 12 : A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics1989; 45: 255. Google Scholar
- 13 : A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol2006; 16: 927. Google Scholar
- 14 : Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Radiol2006; 61: 1423. Google Scholar
- 15 : The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology1997; 50: 562. Google Scholar
- 16 : Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists. Eur Radiol2005; 15: 1826. Google Scholar
- 17 : Focal treatment or observation of prostate cancer: pretreatment accuracy of transrectal ultrasound biopsy and T2-weighted MRI. Urology2010; 75: 472. Google Scholar
- 18 : Diffuse prostatic lesions: role of color Doppler and power Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med1998; 17: 283. Google Scholar
- 19 : Can power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?. Eur Urol2004; 46: 451. Google Scholar
- 20 : Power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer. Am J Roentgenol2000; 174: 623. Google Scholar
- 21 : The impact of real-time elastography guiding a systematic prostate biopsy to improve cancer detection rate: a prospective study of 353 patients. J Urol2012; 187: 2039. Link, Google Scholar
- 22 : Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score. Urology2007; 70: 1136. Google Scholar
- 23 : Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int2007; 100: 42. Google Scholar
- 24 : Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Rev Urol2006; 8: S29. Google Scholar
- 25 : Contrast-ultrasound diffusion imaging for localization of prostate cancer. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2011; 30: 1493. Google Scholar
- 26 : Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol2007; 17: 39. Google Scholar
- 27 : Detection of prostate cancer with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent. Lancet2001; 357: 1849. Google Scholar
- 28 : Prostate cancer: contrast-enhanced us for detection. Radiology2001; 219: 219. Google Scholar
- 29 : Is there a role for anterior zone sampling as part of saturation trans-rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy?. BMC Urol2014; 14: 34. Google Scholar
- 30 : The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int2006; 98: 6. Google Scholar
