Advertisement
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.
Advertisement
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult urology1 Feb 2007

Application of 2 Vibrators Salvages Ejaculatory Failures to 1 Vibrator During Penile Vibratory Stimulation in Men With Spinal Cord Injuries

    View All Author Information

    Purpose:

    Penile vibratory stimulation is the treatment of first choice for anejaculation in men with spinal cord injury. Nonresponders to penile vibratory stimulation are usually referred for electroejaculation or surgical sperm retrieval. Compared to penile vibratory stimulation these methods are invasive and usually yield lower total motile sperm, potentially limiting options for assisted reproductive technologies. To avoid these less than ideal options a simple method to salvage penile vibratory stimulation failures would be of benefit to spinal cord injured patients. We investigated the recovery rate when 2 vibrators were used to salvage ejaculatory failures to 1 vibrator in men with spinal cord injury.

    Materials and Methods:

    A retrospective chart review was performed in 297 spinal cord injured men who underwent a total of 965 trials of penile vibratory stimulation at our center between 1991 and 2006. Only trials with high amplitude vibrators were examined. All men underwent 2 or more penile vibratory stimulation trials using 1 vibrator applied to the dorsum or frenulum of the glans penis. Men failing to ejaculate with 1 vibrator received 1 or more trials in which the glans penis was then sandwiched between 2 vibrators.

    Results:

    Of all men 49% and 57% of those whose level of injury was T10 or above responded to penile vibratory stimulation with 1 vibrator. Of failures with 1 vibrator 22% responded to penile vibratory stimulation with 2 vibrators.

    Conclusions:

    Application of 2 vibrators salvaged ejaculatory failures to 1 vibrator during penile vibratory stimulation procedures in men with spinal cord injury. This simple penile vibratory stimulation sandwich method is recommended before referring patients for electroejaculation or surgical sperm retrieval.

    References

    • 1 : Sexual dysfunction and infertility in men with spinal cord disorders. In: Spinal Cord Medicine: Principles and Practice. Edited by . New York: Demos Medical Publishing2003: 349. chapt 26. Google Scholar
    • 2 : Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in the treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction. Int J Androl2002; 25: 324. Google Scholar
    • 3 : Semen retrieval by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury. Hum Reprod Update1999; 5: 216. Google Scholar
    • 4 : Ejaculation induced by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injuries: The importance of the vibratory amplitude. Paraplegia1994; 32: 651. Google Scholar
    • 5 : A comprehensive approach to the management of male infertility following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord1999; 37: 508. Google Scholar
    • 6 : Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury. Fertil Steril2006; 86: 781. Google Scholar
    • 7 : Autonomic dysreflexia during sperm retrieval in spinal cord injury: influence of lesion level and sildenafil citrate. J Appl Physiol2005; 99: 53. Google Scholar
    • 8 : An analysis of 653 trials of penile vibratory stimulation on men with spinal cord injury. J Urol1998; 159: 1931. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 9 National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2005 Annual Statistical Report, July, 2005. Available at http://images.main.uab.edu/spinalcord/pdffiles/facts05.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2006. Google Scholar
    • 10 : Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neruotrauma2004; 21: 1371. Google Scholar
    • 11 : Male fertility following spinal cord injury: facts and fiction. Phys Ther1996; 76: 1221. Google Scholar
    • 12 : Semen quality of spinal cord injured men is better when obtained by vibratory stimulation versus electroejaculation. J Urol1997; 157: 151. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 13 : Electroejaculation versus vibratory stimulation in spinal cord injured men: sperm quality and patient preference. J Urol1997; 157: 2147. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 14 : Clinical observations in vibratory stimulation of the penis of men with spinal cord injury. Arch Sex Behav1989; 18: 461. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15 : Human sexual response. Boston: Little Brown and Co1966. Google Scholar
    • 16 : Anesthetic block of the dorsal penile nerve inhibits vibratory-induced ejaculation in men with spinal cord injuries. Urology2000; 55: 915. Google Scholar
    • 17 : Reflex ejaculation under vibratory stimulation in paraplegic men. Paraplegia1981; 19: 299. Google Scholar
    • 18 : The fertility of men with spinal injuries. Paraplegia1984; 22: 337. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 : Use of assisted reproductive techniques for treatment of ejaculatory disorders. Andrologia1996; 28: 43. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20 : Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord2001; 39: 514. Google Scholar